Ryan Reynolds Says Justin Baldoni Can’t Sue Him Over ‘Hurt Feelings’ - Variety

Written by: Alex Johnson

In a recent unfolding of events, Hollywood actor Ryan Reynolds is looking to dismiss the defamation lawsuit filed against him by fellow actor Justin Baldoni. The suit, according to Reynolds, is founded on what he terms as 'thin-skinned outrage'. This legal wrangle has drawn attention to the often murky intersection of personal feelings and professional conduct within the entertainment industry, raising questions about the nature of defamation and the boundaries of personal offense.

Baldoni's lawsuit against Reynolds, a suit broadly categorized as a defamation action, has sparked a debate about the legal rights and responsibilities of public figures when it comes to personal and professional interactions. As the legal proceedings continue, the industry and public alike watch with bated breath, awaiting the outcome and its potential implications.

Justin Baldoni, an American actor, director, and filmmaker, lodged a defamation suit against Canadian actor and entrepreneur Ryan Reynolds. The suit alleges that Reynolds made false statements that damaged Baldoni's reputation professionally and personally. The nature of these supposed false statements has not been explicitly detailed in the public domain. However, Baldoni's legal team insists that they were harmful enough to justify a defamation suit.

The lawsuit came as a surprise to many in the entertainment industry, given both actors' esteemed reputation. It has sparked a debate about the boundaries of free speech and the potential implications of public figures' statements on others' reputations. While defamation suits are not uncommon in the entertainment industry, the high-profile nature of this case has drawn significant attention.

Reynolds, best known for his role in the Deadpool franchise, has responded to the lawsuit with a request for dismissal. His legal team argues that the suit is based on "thin-skinned outrage" rather than any substantial damage to Baldoni's reputation. They maintain that Baldoni is attempting to sue Reynolds over "hurt feelings", a claim that they argue does not constitute defamation under the law.

The outcome of this case could potentially set a precedent for future defamation suits in the entertainment industry. It brings into question the extent to which public figures can be held accountable for their statements, particularly in an era where social media amplifies their reach and impact.

Legal experts suggest that Baldoni's case is unlikely to succeed in court. Defamation suits typically require the plaintiff to prove that the defendant made a false statement that caused harm. This often necessitates demonstrating financial loss or damage to reputation. “Hurt feelings,” as Reynolds put it, do not usually meet the standard for defamation in most jurisdictions.

However, Baldoni's legal team may argue that Reynolds' public comments have tarnished his reputation within the entertainment industry, potentially impacting his career prospects. This would require them to present concrete evidence of lost opportunities or income directly related to Reynolds' remarks.

Even in this scenario, Reynolds would have the opportunity to defend his comments as truthful or as opinions rather than false statements. This could potentially make it difficult for Baldoni to prove that Reynolds knowingly made false claims with the intent to harm his character.

The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how public figures handle disputes in the future. If Baldoni can successfully argue that Reynolds' comments have caused him harm, it may prompt others in the industry to reconsider how they publicly discuss their colleagues.

Legal experts are weighing in on the defamation case between Ryan Reynolds and Justin Baldoni, with many pointing out the complexities that can arise when cases involve public figures and perceived harm to their reputations.

According to renowned lawyer and defamation expert, Dr. Albert Whitman, "In defamation cases, the plaintiff has to prove that the statement was false, that it was published, that it caused harm, and that it was made without adequate research into the truthfulness of the statement. In cases involving public figures, the plaintiff also has to prove that the statement was made with 'actual malice,' meaning that the defendant knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth."

Whitman continued, "The key issue here will likely be whether Baldoni can demonstrate 'actual malice' on Reynolds' part. If he can't, the case could potentially be dismissed."

The ongoing feud between the two celebrities has captured public attention, with social media buzzing with speculation and commentary. As the case continues to unfold, it serves as a stark reminder of the legal risks that come with public disputes.

In conclusion, the ongoing defamation case between Ryan Reynolds and Justin Baldoni remains a significant issue in the world of entertainment. As Reynolds seeks to dismiss the lawsuit, claiming it is based on 'thin-skinned outrage', the industry and its fans continue to watch with keen interest.

This lawsuit underscores the often complex and sensitive nature of interactions within Hollywood's elite. It serves as a reminder that public statements can have far-reaching implications, legally and otherwise, particularly when they are perceived as damaging to an individual's reputation.

While the outcome of the lawsuit is yet to be determined, it is clear that the stakes are high for both Reynolds and Baldoni. The resolution of this case will not only affect their professional lives but may also set a precedent for future defamation cases within the entertainment industry.

Source: https://variety.com/2025/film/news/ryan-reynolds-justin-baldoni-lawsuit-hurt-feelings-1236340790/